Company Analysis Huayi Brothers Media Corporation Essay

Founded by the two brothers of Zhongjun Wang and Zhonglei Wang in 1994 in Beijing, Huayi Brothers Media Corp. is a widely known comprehensive media group in China. It grew into a large-sized media group within ten years after venturing into the media field in 1997. At present, Huayi Brothers Media corporation consists of Huayi Brothers International Film Distribution Company, Huayi Brothers Advertising Company, Huayi Brothers Film Investment Company, Huayi Brothers Cultural Brokerage Company, Huayi Brothers Music Company, and Western Film Huayi Brothers Film Distribution Company. These subsidiaries have different business lines but are closely connected in management. The combination of these companies in the media industry has made Huayi Brothers become a true entertainment conglomerate in China. (Frater, 2014) Among them, Huayi Brothers International Film Distribution Company, was founded in October 31, 2004. It is a professional distribution company in the Huayi Brothers Media Corporation. The current distribution is mainly in the direction of the film, drama and music. Business Assets 1. Film Business Since its first investment in the film of Sorry Baby, directed by Xiaogang Feng, in 1998, Huayi Brothers International Film Distribution Company has developed a complete film business operation chain, including investment, distribution and marketing. 2. TV Business This distribution company also focuses on the investment and distribution of domestic TV series. It has

Morality, Justice, And Legitimacy - 1403 Words

Throughout the year’s philosophers have questioned many things regarding morality, justice, and legitimacy. In the readings present by both Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Friedrich Nietzsche the reader will be able to grasp the definition of Rousseau where he states that the only way in which Legitimate Political power is presented when they govern their citizens with consent and equality. Along with Nietzsche definition of justice they express similar concerns that come when States govern their citizens as well as explaining why other forms of legitimacy presented by other philosophers aren’t valid and have fault by not truly defining when it legitimate. Rousseau and Nietzsche have similar views on how the citizens should be governed. In†¦show more content†¦As mentioned before both Nietzsche and Rousseau expresses that the inequality that is forced upon some people has allowed for the poor to be taken advantage of. In the lecture of Discourse Concerning inequality† Professor Leitch expresses the way in which certain groups are oppressed in a state of nature and equality. Leitch refers to the way in which people who are all equal at one point will gain an advantage among the others when they specialize in a manufacturing of goods. As more farmers or blacksmiths create a surplus of their product they are now in a position to sell and profit off what they need and exchange what they have for what they need. In doing so this will give those an advantage in their production further creating an inequality that goes against the state of nature. Along with seeing the inequality on which slaves and masters have they acknowledg e the weakness of a human being and how depended one another is. In Rousseau, he mentions that people with both parents tend to live a longer and healthier life than those with one incentivizing people to staying together if they mate, Nietzsche believes that humans have an animal instinct where In addition to both acknowledging the inequality and the dependency of humanity Nietzsche idea of justice compliments Rousseau claims of legitimate power. The definition of legitimacy is â€Å"the quality or characteristic the we see in some in some institutions or relationships that makes what would usually beShow MoreRelatedThe Case Of The Speluncean Explorers1544 Words   |  7 PagesSpeluncean Explorers, written by Lon Luvious Fuller, comprises of a robust statutory interpretation discussion between natural law and legal positivism. In the context of natural law, naturalist follows that there is an obligatory connection between morality and the law. To put it simply, there is a moral obligation to ascertain the legal cogency of the law. In this case, Foster J follows a natural law approach as he believes that the conviction of each of the defendants should be set aside on the premiseRead MoreMorality and Politics798 Words   |  3 PagesMORALITY AND POLITICS INTRODUCTION If we divide morality of an individual in two types- individual and public, then public morality comes in political morality. Public moralities have responsibility for welfare of other people and keep justice among them. On the other hand, an individual morality is personal views and ethics and this is not responsible for other’s welfare. When we failed to keep both kind of morality separate, then it affects other persons in a destructive way. Morality belongs toRead MoreApplication of African Customary Law in Kenya1586 Words   |  7 Pagesvarious kinds of relationships between members in a community. Customary laws are said to be applicable to the extent that they are not repugnant to justice, morality or any other written law. CUSTOM AS A SOURCE OF LAW Both custom and law are the realization of the measure of society’s insight and ability and also the principles of right and justice. Law embodies these principles in the exercise of its sovereign power while custom embodies its principles as acknowledged and approved by the publicRead MoreThe Case Of Brown V. Board Of Education Of Topeka1694 Words   |  7 Pagesit so significant is the fact that it did the rare task of overturning a previous Supreme Court decision, namely, the case of Plessy v. Ferguson of 1896. Many legal philosophers, even those with differing beliefs, would argue why the Supreme Court Justices were justified in ruling in the manner they did. So, natural law theorists like St. Thomas Aquinas and John Finnis, legal positivists like H. L. A. Hart, and philosopher Ronald Dworkin, while having fundamental differences in their beliefs of whatRead MoreComparing Machiavelli And Hobbes Political Writings And The Leviathan1423 Words   |  6 Pagesis supposed at the making of a Commonwealth, to have abandoned the defense of his life, or limbes, where the law cannot arrive time enough to his assistance.† In this way, the Sovereign defends his own power over the commonwealth by granting man legitimacy of violence for the sake of his own safety, thus further removing fear within the commonwealth, and ensuring their continued allegiance to the Sovereign. The state’s monopoly over the use of violence is explained through the revoking of men’s rightsRead MoreThe Importance Of Human Rights And Social Justice1015 Words   |  5 PagesInternational law is incredibly necessary in the promotion of human rights, and the fight towards widespread social justice. As will be discussed within this analysis, human rights and social justice must be based in international law and national legislation. Basing human rights in international law will result in human rights being comprehensively implemented throughout the world, and thoroughly enforced across nations. Donnelly presented incredibly valid arguments regarding international lawRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s King Lear1546 Words   |  7 Pagesthat of the antagonist. As shown in the Shakespearean play King Lear, there is very little difference between the two. Edmund, who appears to be a villain, is more than meets the eye. His evil is a rebellion against the social order that denies him legitimacy. His villainy does not come from innate cruelty but from misdirected desire for familial love. His remorse in the end displays his humanity and blindness. Through his nature, the social construct, and the humanity he exemplifies, it is impossibleRead MoreDifferences In Jesus’ Message From Judaism in The Gospel of Matthew1358 Words   |  6 Pagesstrength of Judaism, yet Jesus’ message of love and mercy as a formula for human relationship departs radically from the traditional Jewish emphasis on law and justice. I attempt to prove this through chronologically addressing the pi votal points of the evolution of Jesus’ message throughout Matthew, namely, how the authors give legitimacy to the teacher, his sermons, and the violation of Jewish law. The Gospel of Matthew immediately seeks to place Jesus within the bounds of traditional JudaismRead MoreEssay on Durkheim and Marx Theories Applied to Drug Laws847 Words   |  4 Pagesbased on morality and justice. His theories focus on punishment as a reaction to society’s collective beliefs about what is appropriate behavior. Durkheim developed the concept of â€Å"collective conscience†, or the idea of the shared beliefs and attitudes of a society. He theorized that the public provides legitimacy to the criminal justice system because the system reflects society’s collective agreement of the concept of morality. Thus, the collective conscious acts as the vehicle for justice. InRead MoreMarx s Views On Private Property1157 Words   |  5 Pagesconnected to reason and—moreover—morality. A citizen must use their reason and their morals before seizing land. Locke believes that in the state of nature people are â€Å"FIND A GOOD QUOTE ABOUT THE STATE OF NATURE†. In Locke’s society, Justice (or morality) is for citizens to be rewarded in a manner proportional to the abilities of people, where each person’s capacity is different. As such, a society which is operating with reason is acting justly. Contrarily, for Marx, Justice is to respect the equality

Merchant of Venice Free Essays

Alessandro Larosa How does Shakespeare present his ideas (themes, main points, the time, morality and reflection) within the merchant of Venice? Introduction – The play, the merchant of Venice, was written by Shakespeare. The play puts forward ideas and themes which are universal and relevant in today’s life. He uses techniques, dramatic techniques and context to showcase these ideas which form the plot, climax and conclusion of this remarkable play. We will write a custom essay sample on Merchant of Venice or any similar topic only for you Order Now Body – Justice Point: In Venice, 1596, the economic stability was dependant on foreign businessmen like shylock. The city has laws to protect their legal rights and it is how the two religions follow and obey these laws which separate them. Elaboration: In the context of Merchant of Venice, Jews believe in justice, and following the law and Christians are shown to have mercy. Shylock with his bond prepares to cut Antonio’s heart, meanwhile the Christian court begs him and asks why he will not show mercy. Shylock replies saying he doesn’t have a logical reason for why he hates Antonio but he insists on having his bond to for fill his revenge. Example: Shylock has a speech about the courts question. Quote: Tis mine and I will have it. If you deny me, fie upon your law— There is no force in the decrees of Venice. I stand for judgment. Answer, shall I have it? † Technique: Metaphor of the pound of flesh used: A pound of flesh is used as a metaphor for justice. Shylock has had his daughter taken away from him like a part of his flesh and he is simply getting it back, while filling his revenge he is also achieving justice within himself. Link: Shakespeare uses justice to make the play realistic; everything in life is controlled by laws. It is the scales of justice which separates the two religions. Wealth over love Point: In Shakespeare’s plays he always has involved love. But what could be valued more than love, money. Shakespeare brings forward Wealth over love theme to the play to create a sense that is the play about lovers and people having a happily ever after or about their personal wealth. Explanation: In the play Christians are noticed as being generous and selfless about their bank account whereas the Jewish people are portrayed as people who are uptight about their wealth and very protective of anything valuable to them. Quotes: Shylock has his daughter taken from him, as he sees it. She actually leaves to marry Lorenzo. When he looks around to find that she has left for Belmont with all of his wealth, he screams. ‘My daughter! O my ducats! O my daughter! Fled with a Christian! O my Christian ducats! Justice! the law! my ducats, and my daughter! Link: Shakespeare uses this quote to confuse us. Is Shylock more worried about losing his wealth or of his daughter? Through this quote, Shakespeare also has us thinking another situation. Is this any different from the way Bassonio goes after Portia for her money. In both cases Shakespeare shows that human relationships are hard to tell apart from wealth. Appearance vs. reality Point: Another theme that is put forward by Shakespeare in the play is appearance vs. reality. This theme is symbolic of the most universal human problem in the context in The Merchant of Venice and in modern society. Explanation Shakespeare expresses this theme through a dead father of a living daughter Portia. There are three caskets, one gold, one silver and one bronze. The three of them are a game of chance, a gamble laid out in order to find the right suitor for Portia and her father’s wealth. One of the three contains a skull, a fools head and the last Portia’s picture. Example. The outside of the gold casket promises, Who chooseth me shall gain what many men desire. † It’s sounds good but it is a trick. Once opened it contains a skull with a smug message, â€Å"All that glisters is not gold. † The Gold casket and skull symbolise that appearances are often deceiving and human desire, such as wealth, can be dangerous. The inscription silver casket expl ains, â€Å"Who chooseth me shall get as much as he deserves. † The inside contains a smiling face of an idiot and with a note that reads, â€Å"So be gone: you are sped. † Whoever chooses the silver casket is a fool who’ll get what he deserves (a picture of another fool). Finally, the lead chest. The metal is used to symbolize inner beauty and modesty and contains a picture of Portia. The inscription is very significant, â€Å"Who chooseth me must give and hazard all he hath† The inscription is symbolic of marriage and reminds us of the fact that Bassanio’s battle for Portia literally involves a man who must â€Å"hazard all he hath,† in marriage. Also in relation to Antonio, who risks his life to loan his best friend the money to woo his wife to be. Technique Shakespeare uses juxtaposition with the gold and lead caskets to create a visual representation of Appearance vs. Reality. The lead casket is gold in disguise. Link Shakespeare expresses the theme through the characters and techniques in the merchant of Venice. The theme is used to engage the audience as we are eager to look behind disguises and find the reality of the characters and the events. Conclusion – There are many different themes in The Merchant of Venice which are moral values. To show mercy, to think twice about a book with a glistening cover and to treasure human relationships over the insignificance of wealth. Through the techniques and examples revealed in the Merchant of Venice Shakespeare displays ideas which are extremely significant from when it was first written to present. How to cite Merchant of Venice, Papers Merchant of Venice Free Essays The Merchant of Venice Essay ‘Shylock was justified in taking revenge on Antonio. ’ Do you agree? In ‘The Merchant of Venice’ by William Shakespeare, Shylock the Jew is portrayed as the antagonist of the story. Cunning, vengeful and cruel are words you may use to describe this malicious character, but does he really deserve this reputation? Upon the mention of Shylock, the saying ‘Never judge a book by its cover’ comes to mind. We will write a custom essay sample on Merchant of Venice or any similar topic only for you Order Now Though Shylock is seen as a cruel and spiteful character, if one takes the time to seriously analyze the story, you will find that Shylock’s behavior is not without reason. Under the circumstances that had befallen him, it is relatively normal that Shylock would wish to seek revenge towards Antonio, seeing as Antonio had not treated Shylock amiably in the past, calling him ‘cut throat dog’ and even going as far as to spitting on his Jewish robes. But Shylock did take the whole ‘revenge’ factor a little too far, and most, if not all people would agree that his desire for revenge should not be justified. However, there are always two sides to every story, and I believe that in this case, not many people take Shylock’s side of the story into enough consideration. I believe that if one takes the time to analyze the situation thoroughly without showing favor for either sides, you will realize that Shylock has not made any unfair demands towards Antonio. Looking further into the matter, it is seen that Shylock and Antonio were both business men, and they had signed a contract, clearly outlining the bond, also including the chilling results of a broken bond. As Antonio was a known business man, he knew exactly what would happen to him if he did not return the money by the due date, but he was so certain that his ships would be back before the given time that he did not think much about the risk and danger he was putting himself into by agreeing to the bond. Since Antonio knew the consequences he would face from the moment he signed the bond, he is legally and rightfully bound to it. So from this point of view, you can see that this situation is in Shylock’s favor, as he is not the one who has broken the bond. From this angle of view, it is clear that it is Antonio and his fellow friends who refuse to uphold the agreements in the bond. In this case, it is only fair that Shylock should enforce the bond, no matter how cruel, as the revenge was rightfully his. During the time of the trial, it was revealed that Shylock was going through a troublesome time, not only with Antonio, but also with of his only daughter Jessica, who had eloped with Lorenzo, a Christian. When she left, she also took a large amount of his riches with her, causing Shylock the loss of both his daughter and a significant portion of his wealth. After this traumatizing event, Shylock’s loathing towards Christians would have risen considerably, since he strongly believed that he had been wronged, and that his daughter’s undutiful behavior was caused by her Christian husband. This attitude and state of mind may have very likely contributed towards his unmoving thirst for revenge against Antonio and his fellow Christians. From the court scene, it can be seen that Shylock was very determined to uphold the law of Venice, and refused to destroy the bond even when offered double, even triple of the original amount of money owed. This shows that though he has ulterior motives to denying the extra payment, he takes contracts seriously and is indeed ‘a man of his word’. He also fully agrees with all of Portia’s statements and interpretations, despite the fact that she is also a Christian, and seemed to particularly enjoy her statements regarding the fulfillment of his bond with Antonio. All in all, I personally believe that Shylock’s character in The Merchant of Venice has not been given full justice, especially regarding the bond between himself and Antonio. Also as I have mentioned before, his malicious behavior can be traced back to various events in his life, and he is not seeking revenge without solid evidence, and it is Antonio that hides from his responsibilities regarding the broken bond. Shylock is a very good example on which the saying ‘Never judge a book by its cover’ is proven to be completely accurate. How to cite Merchant of Venice, Essay examples