Morality, Justice, And Legitimacy - 1403 Words

Throughout the year’s philosophers have questioned many things regarding morality, justice, and legitimacy. In the readings present by both Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Friedrich Nietzsche the reader will be able to grasp the definition of Rousseau where he states that the only way in which Legitimate Political power is presented when they govern their citizens with consent and equality. Along with Nietzsche definition of justice they express similar concerns that come when States govern their citizens as well as explaining why other forms of legitimacy presented by other philosophers aren’t valid and have fault by not truly defining when it legitimate. Rousseau and Nietzsche have similar views on how the citizens should be governed. In†¦show more content†¦As mentioned before both Nietzsche and Rousseau expresses that the inequality that is forced upon some people has allowed for the poor to be taken advantage of. In the lecture of Discourse Concerning inequality† Professor Leitch expresses the way in which certain groups are oppressed in a state of nature and equality. Leitch refers to the way in which people who are all equal at one point will gain an advantage among the others when they specialize in a manufacturing of goods. As more farmers or blacksmiths create a surplus of their product they are now in a position to sell and profit off what they need and exchange what they have for what they need. In doing so this will give those an advantage in their production further creating an inequality that goes against the state of nature. Along with seeing the inequality on which slaves and masters have they acknowledg e the weakness of a human being and how depended one another is. In Rousseau, he mentions that people with both parents tend to live a longer and healthier life than those with one incentivizing people to staying together if they mate, Nietzsche believes that humans have an animal instinct where In addition to both acknowledging the inequality and the dependency of humanity Nietzsche idea of justice compliments Rousseau claims of legitimate power. The definition of legitimacy is â€Å"the quality or characteristic the we see in some in some institutions or relationships that makes what would usually beShow MoreRelatedThe Case Of The Speluncean Explorers1544 Words   |  7 PagesSpeluncean Explorers, written by Lon Luvious Fuller, comprises of a robust statutory interpretation discussion between natural law and legal positivism. In the context of natural law, naturalist follows that there is an obligatory connection between morality and the law. To put it simply, there is a moral obligation to ascertain the legal cogency of the law. In this case, Foster J follows a natural law approach as he believes that the conviction of each of the defendants should be set aside on the premiseRead MoreMorality and Politics798 Words   |  3 PagesMORALITY AND POLITICS INTRODUCTION If we divide morality of an individual in two types- individual and public, then public morality comes in political morality. Public moralities have responsibility for welfare of other people and keep justice among them. On the other hand, an individual morality is personal views and ethics and this is not responsible for other’s welfare. When we failed to keep both kind of morality separate, then it affects other persons in a destructive way. Morality belongs toRead MoreApplication of African Customary Law in Kenya1586 Words   |  7 Pagesvarious kinds of relationships between members in a community. Customary laws are said to be applicable to the extent that they are not repugnant to justice, morality or any other written law. CUSTOM AS A SOURCE OF LAW Both custom and law are the realization of the measure of society’s insight and ability and also the principles of right and justice. Law embodies these principles in the exercise of its sovereign power while custom embodies its principles as acknowledged and approved by the publicRead MoreThe Case Of Brown V. Board Of Education Of Topeka1694 Words   |  7 Pagesit so significant is the fact that it did the rare task of overturning a previous Supreme Court decision, namely, the case of Plessy v. Ferguson of 1896. Many legal philosophers, even those with differing beliefs, would argue why the Supreme Court Justices were justified in ruling in the manner they did. So, natural law theorists like St. Thomas Aquinas and John Finnis, legal positivists like H. L. A. Hart, and philosopher Ronald Dworkin, while having fundamental differences in their beliefs of whatRead MoreComparing Machiavelli And Hobbes Political Writings And The Leviathan1423 Words   |  6 Pagesis supposed at the making of a Commonwealth, to have abandoned the defense of his life, or limbes, where the law cannot arrive time enough to his assistance.† In this way, the Sovereign defends his own power over the commonwealth by granting man legitimacy of violence for the sake of his own safety, thus further removing fear within the commonwealth, and ensuring their continued allegiance to the Sovereign. The state’s monopoly over the use of violence is explained through the revoking of men’s rightsRead MoreThe Importance Of Human Rights And Social Justice1015 Words   |  5 PagesInternational law is incredibly necessary in the promotion of human rights, and the fight towards widespread social justice. As will be discussed within this analysis, human rights and social justice must be based in international law and national legislation. Basing human rights in international law will result in human rights being comprehensively implemented throughout the world, and thoroughly enforced across nations. Donnelly presented incredibly valid arguments regarding international lawRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s King Lear1546 Words   |  7 Pagesthat of the antagonist. As shown in the Shakespearean play King Lear, there is very little difference between the two. Edmund, who appears to be a villain, is more than meets the eye. His evil is a rebellion against the social order that denies him legitimacy. His villainy does not come from innate cruelty but from misdirected desire for familial love. His remorse in the end displays his humanity and blindness. Through his nature, the social construct, and the humanity he exemplifies, it is impossibleRead MoreDifferences In Jesus’ Message From Judaism in The Gospel of Matthew1358 Words   |  6 Pagesstrength of Judaism, yet Jesus’ message of love and mercy as a formula for human relationship departs radically from the traditional Jewish emphasis on law and justice. I attempt to prove this through chronologically addressing the pi votal points of the evolution of Jesus’ message throughout Matthew, namely, how the authors give legitimacy to the teacher, his sermons, and the violation of Jewish law. The Gospel of Matthew immediately seeks to place Jesus within the bounds of traditional JudaismRead MoreEssay on Durkheim and Marx Theories Applied to Drug Laws847 Words   |  4 Pagesbased on morality and justice. His theories focus on punishment as a reaction to society’s collective beliefs about what is appropriate behavior. Durkheim developed the concept of â€Å"collective conscience†, or the idea of the shared beliefs and attitudes of a society. He theorized that the public provides legitimacy to the criminal justice system because the system reflects society’s collective agreement of the concept of morality. Thus, the collective conscious acts as the vehicle for justice. InRead MoreMarx s Views On Private Property1157 Words   |  5 Pagesconnected to reason and—moreover—morality. A citizen must use their reason and their morals before seizing land. Locke believes that in the state of nature people are â€Å"FIND A GOOD QUOTE ABOUT THE STATE OF NATURE†. In Locke’s society, Justice (or morality) is for citizens to be rewarded in a manner proportional to the abilities of people, where each person’s capacity is different. As such, a society which is operating with reason is acting justly. Contrarily, for Marx, Justice is to respect the equality